<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (11) TMI 102 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67611</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the IAC&#039;s directions under Section 144A to be illegal for not providing the assessee an opportunity. The assessment annulled by the Commissioner (Appeals) should have been corrected from the stage of the illegal direction, rather than annulled. The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal, directing the IAC to re-examine the case from the time of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 18:07:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (11) TMI 102 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67611</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the IAC&#039;s directions under Section 144A to be illegal for not providing the assessee an opportunity. The assessment annulled by the Commissioner (Appeals) should have been corrected from the stage of the illegal direction, rather than annulled. The Tribunal allowed the department&#039;s appeal, directing the IAC to re-examine the case from the time of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>