<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 78 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67608</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the ITO&#039;s assessment, finding it lacked sufficient and reliable evidence. The entire addition of Rs. 24.15 lakhs was deleted, emphasizing procedural fairness and the need for concrete evidence in assessments. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to address other grounds raised by the assessee. The departmental appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:07:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 78 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67608</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the ITO&#039;s assessment, finding it lacked sufficient and reliable evidence. The entire addition of Rs. 24.15 lakhs was deleted, emphasizing procedural fairness and the need for concrete evidence in assessments. The Commissioner (Appeals) was directed to address other grounds raised by the assessee. The departmental appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>