<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 162 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67576</link>
    <description>Explanation 3 to section 64(1) applies only to clauses (iv) and (v) and cannot be extended by interpretation to clause (vi); taxing provisions cannot be enlarged beyond their express language, so the daughter&#039;s-in-law share of profit was not includible in the assessee&#039;s income under section 64(1)(vi). The deposit of the gifted amount with the firm also lacked the direct nexus needed to treat it as part of the partner-inclusion rule, reinforcing that the income could not be clubbed in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 14:05:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 162 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67576</link>
      <description>Explanation 3 to section 64(1) applies only to clauses (iv) and (v) and cannot be extended by interpretation to clause (vi); taxing provisions cannot be enlarged beyond their express language, so the daughter&#039;s-in-law share of profit was not includible in the assessee&#039;s income under section 64(1)(vi). The deposit of the gifted amount with the firm also lacked the direct nexus needed to treat it as part of the partner-inclusion rule, reinforcing that the income could not be clubbed in the assessee&#039;s hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>