<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (7) TMI 123 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67568</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was successful. The Commissioner (Appeals) had incorrectly allowed relief to the assessee, and the decision was set aside. The case was remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) to reassess whether the payments made in 1975, totaling Rs. 35,000, qualified for deduction under section 40A(3) in accordance with rule 6DD(j).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:13:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (7) TMI 123 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67568</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal against the deletion of an addition under section 40A(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was successful. The Commissioner (Appeals) had incorrectly allowed relief to the assessee, and the decision was set aside. The case was remanded back to the Commissioner (Appeals) to reassess whether the payments made in 1975, totaling Rs. 35,000, qualified for deduction under section 40A(3) in accordance with rule 6DD(j).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67568</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>