<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 144 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67564</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the assessment of interest earned from bank deposits as income from other sources and disallowing the deduction of interest paid on borrowings for factory construction. However, it allowed the expenditure on mineral extraction as business expenditure and directed the recalculation of interest under section 217 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:00:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 144 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67564</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding the assessment of interest earned from bank deposits as income from other sources and disallowing the deduction of interest paid on borrowings for factory construction. However, it allowed the expenditure on mineral extraction as business expenditure and directed the recalculation of interest under section 217 of the Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>