<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 175 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67557</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete a penalty imposed under section 269SS of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal determined that the assessee did not violate section 269SS as the deposits were made through transfer vouchers and credited via proper banking channels, aligning with the legislative intent to prevent unaccounted cash acceptance. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the necessity of complying with section 269SS requirements for accepting cash deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:43:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 175 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67557</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete a penalty imposed under section 269SS of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal determined that the assessee did not violate section 269SS as the deposits were made through transfer vouchers and credited via proper banking channels, aligning with the legislative intent to prevent unaccounted cash acceptance. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the necessity of complying with section 269SS requirements for accepting cash deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>