<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 122 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67552</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the dividend income received by the cooperative society on shares of Jaipur Metals &amp;amp; Electricals Ltd. did not qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the dividend income from shares was not attributable to banking activities and noted the potential for losses due to market fluctuations, unlike more stable Government securities. The assessee&#039;s appeal was therefore denied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:29:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 122 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67552</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal, ruling that the dividend income received by the cooperative society on shares of Jaipur Metals &amp;amp; Electricals Ltd. did not qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the dividend income from shares was not attributable to banking activities and noted the potential for losses due to market fluctuations, unlike more stable Government securities. The assessee&#039;s appeal was therefore denied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>