<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 160 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67533</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. It upheld the assessee&#039;s arguments, overturning the Commissioner of Gift-tax&#039;s decision. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of valuation rules under the Acts and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s contention of impracticability in applying the rules. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the Commissioner&#039;s order was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 160 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67533</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue interests. It upheld the assessee&#039;s arguments, overturning the Commissioner of Gift-tax&#039;s decision. The Tribunal emphasized the mandatory nature of valuation rules under the Acts and rejected the Commissioner&#039;s contention of impracticability in applying the rules. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the Commissioner&#039;s order was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>