<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67529</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the CIT&#039;s order under section 263. It held that the AO&#039;s assessment was proper, deductions claimed were valid, and income from the nursery was correctly treated as agricultural income. The tribunal emphasized the importance of balanced interpretation of tax provisions to achieve legislative intent without prejudicing the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:18:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67529</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the CIT&#039;s order under section 263. It held that the AO&#039;s assessment was proper, deductions claimed were valid, and income from the nursery was correctly treated as agricultural income. The tribunal emphasized the importance of balanced interpretation of tax provisions to achieve legislative intent without prejudicing the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>