<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (6) TMI 71 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67528</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the order dismissing the application under Section 256(1) was a nullity due to the absence of the applicant, constituting a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal directed the restoration of the reference application, granting parties a fresh opportunity to be heard in accordance with the principles of natural justice and rectifying the error under Section 254(2) of the IT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:14:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (6) TMI 71 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67528</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, ruling that the order dismissing the application under Section 256(1) was a nullity due to the absence of the applicant, constituting a mistake apparent from the record. The Tribunal directed the restoration of the reference application, granting parties a fresh opportunity to be heard in accordance with the principles of natural justice and rectifying the error under Section 254(2) of the IT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jun 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>