<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 104 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67524</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the necessity of actual payment for the allowance of interest on delayed payments related to statutory liabilities. The decision reaffirmed the importance of fulfilling statutory obligations before claiming deductions, in line with the provisions of section 43B.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:03:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 104 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67524</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the necessity of actual payment for the allowance of interest on delayed payments related to statutory liabilities. The decision reaffirmed the importance of fulfilling statutory obligations before claiming deductions, in line with the provisions of section 43B.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>