<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (2) TMI 128 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, vacating the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to give credit for the seized amount before charging interest and dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal upheld the charge of interest under section 217(1A), confirming the legality of the liability and the correctness of the interest charged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:43:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (2) TMI 128 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, vacating the CIT(A)&#039;s direction to give credit for the seized amount before charging interest and dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal upheld the charge of interest under section 217(1A), confirming the legality of the liability and the correctness of the interest charged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>