<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 185 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67507</link>
    <description>A regularly maintained construction account supported by vouchers and reflected in books of account could not be disregarded for alleged unexplained investment in hotel construction absent specific defects. The ITAT noted that the Assessing Officer did not point out any concrete defect in the records, so the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s estimate could not override the recorded expenditure. The assessee&#039;s registered valuer&#039;s estimate, based on State PWD rates and supported by the construction record, was accepted as more appropriate than the DVO&#039;s general CPWD-based estimate. On that basis, the addition under section 69 for unexplained construction investment was held unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:08:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 185 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67507</link>
      <description>A regularly maintained construction account supported by vouchers and reflected in books of account could not be disregarded for alleged unexplained investment in hotel construction absent specific defects. The ITAT noted that the Assessing Officer did not point out any concrete defect in the records, so the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s estimate could not override the recorded expenditure. The assessee&#039;s registered valuer&#039;s estimate, based on State PWD rates and supported by the construction record, was accepted as more appropriate than the DVO&#039;s general CPWD-based estimate. On that basis, the addition under section 69 for unexplained construction investment was held unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>