<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 169 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67502</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was not justified in directing the Assessing Officer not to charge interest under sections 139(8) and 215/217 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the interest was still chargeable based on the final assessed income after the Tribunal&#039;s order. The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed, and the order of the CIT(A) directing non-charging of interest was canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:53:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 169 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67502</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was not justified in directing the Assessing Officer not to charge interest under sections 139(8) and 215/217 of the IT Act. The Tribunal found that the interest was still chargeable based on the final assessed income after the Tribunal&#039;s order. The appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed, and the order of the CIT(A) directing non-charging of interest was canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>