<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 123 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67480</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, resulting in the deletion of all additions made by the Assessing Officer. Key issues included additions based on seized documents, alleged investments and profits, notional income, and charging of interest under the IT Act. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee on each issue, rebutting presumptions and lack of evidence, ultimately leading to the deletion of the additions and the decision that no interest should be charged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 123 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67480</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, resulting in the deletion of all additions made by the Assessing Officer. Key issues included additions based on seized documents, alleged investments and profits, notional income, and charging of interest under the IT Act. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee on each issue, rebutting presumptions and lack of evidence, ultimately leading to the deletion of the additions and the decision that no interest should be charged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>