<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 188 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67472</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee exemption from capital gains under section 54F of the Income-tax Act. Despite the property having a swimming pool, it was deemed a residential house suitable for habitation, entitling the assessee to the deduction. The Assessing Officer was directed to consider the capital gains assessment with the allowable exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:33:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 188 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67472</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee exemption from capital gains under section 54F of the Income-tax Act. Despite the property having a swimming pool, it was deemed a residential house suitable for habitation, entitling the assessee to the deduction. The Assessing Officer was directed to consider the capital gains assessment with the allowable exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>