<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (12) TMI 97 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67460</link>
    <description>Deduction under section 80HHC was confined to goods exported out of India with sale proceeds receivable in convertible foreign exchange, so supplies to ONGC and Oil India Ltd. did not qualify as exports for this purpose. A Ministry of Commerce circular treating such supplies as deemed exports applied only for that ministry&#039;s limited purpose and could not satisfy the statutory conditions. In the absence of a CBDT notification bringing such supplies within the provision, the deduction claim failed and was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (12) TMI 97 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67460</link>
      <description>Deduction under section 80HHC was confined to goods exported out of India with sale proceeds receivable in convertible foreign exchange, so supplies to ONGC and Oil India Ltd. did not qualify as exports for this purpose. A Ministry of Commerce circular treating such supplies as deemed exports applied only for that ministry&#039;s limited purpose and could not satisfy the statutory conditions. In the absence of a CBDT notification bringing such supplies within the provision, the deduction claim failed and was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>