<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (10) TMI 94 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67456</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of assets introduced in the firm remains unchanged unless a sale occurs, rejecting the claim that liabilities taken over increase the cost. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of relevant provisions and case law, ultimately upholding the ITO&#039;s assessment and overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The written down value was determined to be Rs. 76,931.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (10) TMI 94 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67456</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the cost of assets introduced in the firm remains unchanged unless a sale occurs, rejecting the claim that liabilities taken over increase the cost. The decision was based on a thorough analysis of relevant provisions and case law, ultimately upholding the ITO&#039;s assessment and overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision. The written down value was determined to be Rs. 76,931.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>