<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (3) TMI 120 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67451</link>
    <description>The appeal by the revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal confirmed the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), deleting the additions made by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) in the groundnut oil and Tara Meera accounts. The Tribunal found that the stock register was properly maintained and the yield shown by the assessee was reasonable, supporting the AAC&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:45:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (3) TMI 120 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67451</link>
      <description>The appeal by the revenue was dismissed. The Tribunal confirmed the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC), deleting the additions made by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) in the groundnut oil and Tara Meera accounts. The Tribunal found that the stock register was properly maintained and the yield shown by the assessee was reasonable, supporting the AAC&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>