<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 166 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It concluded that the addition of Rs. 79,753 as income from undisclosed sources should be assessed in the assessment year 1975-76. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the addition under section 40A(3) was not justified due to the lack of evidence of cash payments, ultimately leading to the deletion of the said addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 166 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It concluded that the addition of Rs. 79,753 as income from undisclosed sources should be assessed in the assessment year 1975-76. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the addition under section 40A(3) was not justified due to the lack of evidence of cash payments, ultimately leading to the deletion of the said addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>