<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 216 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting various additions made by the AO and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The additions for capital contributions, security deposits, sundry liabilities, commission expenses, vehicle running/rent expenses, breakage loss, and unexplained deposit with the Excise Department were deleted as the assessee provided sufficient evidence to support the sources of funds and expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 216 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting various additions made by the AO and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The additions for capital contributions, security deposits, sundry liabilities, commission expenses, vehicle running/rent expenses, breakage loss, and unexplained deposit with the Excise Department were deleted as the assessee provided sufficient evidence to support the sources of funds and expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>