<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 222 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67421</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed. Various additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal due to lack of sufficient evidence or basis for the additions. Relief was granted in certain instances after verification, and the Tribunal directed the AO to allow a further relief based on the declared GP rate of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 222 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67421</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed. Various additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted by the CIT(A) and upheld by the Tribunal due to lack of sufficient evidence or basis for the additions. Relief was granted in certain instances after verification, and the Tribunal directed the AO to allow a further relief based on the declared GP rate of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>