<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 96 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 3,49,225 under Section 69A of the IT Act, as the assessee failed to satisfactorily explain the possession of the silver. The appeal was dismissed, confirming that the unexplained possession of the silver could be taxed under the general law and Section 69C. The stay application was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:06:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 96 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 3,49,225 under Section 69A of the IT Act, as the assessee failed to satisfactorily explain the possession of the silver. The appeal was dismissed, confirming that the unexplained possession of the silver could be taxed under the general law and Section 69C. The stay application was also dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>