<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (5) TMI 46 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67333</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur upheld the CIT&#039;s decision under Section 263 of the IT Act regarding the valuation of closing stock for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the valuation methods used by the assessee and the CIT, determining that both were incorrect. It concluded that the closing stock should have been valued at the purchase rate or market rate, whichever was lower, leading to revised valuation figures. The Tribunal held that the initial assessments were erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue, justifying the CIT&#039;s decision to set them aside. The appeal was dismissed, and the ITO was directed to revalue the closing stock based on the purchase rate for consistency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:56:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (5) TMI 46 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67333</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur upheld the CIT&#039;s decision under Section 263 of the IT Act regarding the valuation of closing stock for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the valuation methods used by the assessee and the CIT, determining that both were incorrect. It concluded that the closing stock should have been valued at the purchase rate or market rate, whichever was lower, leading to revised valuation figures. The Tribunal held that the initial assessments were erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue, justifying the CIT&#039;s decision to set them aside. The appeal was dismissed, and the ITO was directed to revalue the closing stock based on the purchase rate for consistency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>