<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 124 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67330</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur ruled in favor of the assessee in the case involving the levy of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the delay of over seven years in re-imposing the penalty by the IAC was unjustified, emphasizing the strict construction of limitations for imposing penalties. As a result, the penalty of Rs. 14,915 was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and avoiding undue delays in penalty impositions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 10:52:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 124 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67330</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur ruled in favor of the assessee in the case involving the levy of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Tribunal found that the delay of over seven years in re-imposing the penalty by the IAC was unjustified, emphasizing the strict construction of limitations for imposing penalties. As a result, the penalty of Rs. 14,915 was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory limitations and avoiding undue delays in penalty impositions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>