<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (6) TMI 49 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting registration to the assessee firm. It emphasized the harmonious construction of the IT Act and the Partnership Act, recognizing the six-month period for minors to elect to become partners and validating the partnership deed executed within this period. The Tribunal found the refusal of registration by the ITO and AAC to be hypertechnical and not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:34:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (6) TMI 49 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting registration to the assessee firm. It emphasized the harmonious construction of the IT Act and the Partnership Act, recognizing the six-month period for minors to elect to become partners and validating the partnership deed executed within this period. The Tribunal found the refusal of registration by the ITO and AAC to be hypertechnical and not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>