<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (2) TMI 31 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67283</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur allowed the appeals by a partnership firm against the Addl. CIT&#039;s orders under section 263 of the IT Act, deeming them erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interest. The Addl. CIT&#039;s decision was based on suspicion without substantial evidence, primarily concerning the genuineness of the registration application and partnership deed filing. The Tribunal found the Addl. CIT lacked valid grounds to set aside the ITO&#039;s orders and emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence for invoking revisional powers. Consequently, the Tribunal reversed the Addl. CIT&#039;s orders, restoring registration to the appellant firm for all assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (2) TMI 31 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67283</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jabalpur allowed the appeals by a partnership firm against the Addl. CIT&#039;s orders under section 263 of the IT Act, deeming them erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue&#039;s interest. The Addl. CIT&#039;s decision was based on suspicion without substantial evidence, primarily concerning the genuineness of the registration application and partnership deed filing. The Tribunal found the Addl. CIT lacked valid grounds to set aside the ITO&#039;s orders and emphasized the necessity of concrete evidence for invoking revisional powers. Consequently, the Tribunal reversed the Addl. CIT&#039;s orders, restoring registration to the appellant firm for all assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>