<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (2) TMI 64 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) based on the Circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). The Circular prevented the application of the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) in cases where the assessed income did not exceed Rs. 10,000 due to specific additions, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Income Tax Officer&#039;s appeal as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105714" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (2) TMI 64 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) based on the Circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). The Circular prevented the application of the Explanation to section 271(1)(c) in cases where the assessed income did not exceed Rs. 10,000 due to specific additions, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the Income Tax Officer&#039;s appeal as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>