<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 62 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, determining the assessee&#039;s status as &quot;HUF&quot; from the assessment year 1966-67 onwards based on returns. The AAC&#039;s estimation of sales and net profit at 2.30 times lease money paid and 13.5%, respectively, was upheld due to the lack of specific sales data and financial records in the timber contract business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 18:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 62 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, determining the assessee&#039;s status as &quot;HUF&quot; from the assessment year 1966-67 onwards based on returns. The AAC&#039;s estimation of sales and net profit at 2.30 times lease money paid and 13.5%, respectively, was upheld due to the lack of specific sales data and financial records in the timber contract business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>