<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 283 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the penalty order by directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty only concerning the addition of 580.621 kgs of silver ornaments. The penalty for the remaining unexplained stock was deleted, as the Tribunal found it unjustified due to lack of evidence disproving the assessee&#039;s claim made on an agreed basis. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:13:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 283 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the penalty order by directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the penalty only concerning the addition of 580.621 kgs of silver ornaments. The penalty for the remaining unexplained stock was deleted, as the Tribunal found it unjustified due to lack of evidence disproving the assessee&#039;s claim made on an agreed basis. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>