<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (2) TMI 115 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67212</link>
    <description>Issue 1 involved the valuation of library books for wealth tax purposes under section 5(1)(x) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the exemption granted to a senior Advocate of the Supreme Court, considering the books as necessary tools for the legal profession. The Tribunal deemed the books as &#039;plant&#039; essential for business purposes, leading to the deletion of book valuation from the assessee&#039;s wealth. In Issue 2, the Tribunal affirmed a reduced valuation of a plot at Neeti Bagh due to restrictions on transfer imposed by the lessor Co-operative House Building Society, following precedent and considering market value impacted by transfer restrictions. The revenue&#039;s appeals in both issues were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:33:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (2) TMI 115 - ITAT JABALPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67212</link>
      <description>Issue 1 involved the valuation of library books for wealth tax purposes under section 5(1)(x) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the exemption granted to a senior Advocate of the Supreme Court, considering the books as necessary tools for the legal profession. The Tribunal deemed the books as &#039;plant&#039; essential for business purposes, leading to the deletion of book valuation from the assessee&#039;s wealth. In Issue 2, the Tribunal affirmed a reduced valuation of a plot at Neeti Bagh due to restrictions on transfer imposed by the lessor Co-operative House Building Society, following precedent and considering market value impacted by transfer restrictions. The revenue&#039;s appeals in both issues were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>