<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 125 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67202</link>
    <description>A deemed gift under the Gift-tax Act was not established on a partner&#039;s retirement and reconstitution of the firm because the record did not show any transfer or surrender of goodwill or assets without consideration in favour of the minors. The retiring partner&#039;s account was settled on the basis of a debit balance, the reconstituted deed did not evidence consent to any transfer of goodwill, and the minors had contributed capital to the firm. In the absence of material proving the essential element of transfer in favour of the beneficiaries, the deeming provision was inapplicable and the addition treating the transaction as a gift was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:04:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 125 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67202</link>
      <description>A deemed gift under the Gift-tax Act was not established on a partner&#039;s retirement and reconstitution of the firm because the record did not show any transfer or surrender of goodwill or assets without consideration in favour of the minors. The retiring partner&#039;s account was settled on the basis of a debit balance, the reconstituted deed did not evidence consent to any transfer of goodwill, and the minors had contributed capital to the firm. In the absence of material proving the essential element of transfer in favour of the beneficiaries, the deeming provision was inapplicable and the addition treating the transaction as a gift was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>