<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 242 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, remanding the matters for verification of tax payments by the payees. It upheld that Section 194J did not apply to payments for royalty, technical aids, and courseware consumption but did apply to technical know-how fees. The Tribunal also confirmed the charging of interest under Section 201(1A) but allowed for verification of tax payments to potentially negate the demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 242 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeals and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, remanding the matters for verification of tax payments by the payees. It upheld that Section 194J did not apply to payments for royalty, technical aids, and courseware consumption but did apply to technical know-how fees. The Tribunal also confirmed the charging of interest under Section 201(1A) but allowed for verification of tax payments to potentially negate the demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>