<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 298 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67180</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated the reassessment proceedings under Section 148 as they were based on a mere change of opinion, contrary to law. The issue of adding Rs. 1,15,20,000 due to a change in the method of valuation of closing stock was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal directed the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 298 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67180</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated the reassessment proceedings under Section 148 as they were based on a mere change of opinion, contrary to law. The issue of adding Rs. 1,15,20,000 due to a change in the method of valuation of closing stock was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further examination. The Tribunal directed the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>