https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67179 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, reversing the orders of the CIT(A) and CIT. The assessee's registration under section 12A was reinstated, and assessments for the relevant years were to be reconsidered. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of promissory estoppel and found the CIT's order lacked justification, violating natural justice. The Tribunal highlighted the absence of sufficient reasons for cancellation and the lack of a change in the assessee's charitable activities. The appeal was allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess in line with the Tribunal's findings. en-us Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:36:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67179 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, reversing the orders of the CIT(A) and CIT. The assessee's registration under section 12A was reinstated, and assessments for the relevant years were to be reconsidered. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of promissory estoppel and found the CIT's order lacked justification, violating natural justice. The Tribunal highlighted the absence of sufficient reasons for cancellation and the lack of a change in the assessee's charitable activities. The appeal was allowed, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess in line with the Tribunal's findings. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 30 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67179