<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 285 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, partially allowing the appeal. The additions for gold ornaments, silver utensils, and donation/expenses were contested. The Tribunal found the explanations credible, considering family traditions and ownership proofs, leading to the deletion of the disputed amounts. The Tribunal limited the silver utensils addition based on evidence of long-standing family ownership. The additions for donation and expenses were deleted as other family expenses from withdrawals were accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 13:31:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 285 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, partially allowing the appeal. The additions for gold ornaments, silver utensils, and donation/expenses were contested. The Tribunal found the explanations credible, considering family traditions and ownership proofs, leading to the deletion of the disputed amounts. The Tribunal limited the silver utensils addition based on evidence of long-standing family ownership. The additions for donation and expenses were deleted as other family expenses from withdrawals were accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>