<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 233 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty under Section 271D to Rs. 18,500, and dismissed the appeal challenging the penalty under Section 271E. The judgment highlighted the significance of tax law compliance, strict interpretation of penalty provisions, and the responsibility of taxpayers to be aware of legal requirements, even with professional assistance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 233 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, reducing the penalty under Section 271D to Rs. 18,500, and dismissed the appeal challenging the penalty under Section 271E. The judgment highlighted the significance of tax law compliance, strict interpretation of penalty provisions, and the responsibility of taxpayers to be aware of legal requirements, even with professional assistance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>