<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 164 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the IT Act, 1961. However, the disallowances under section 37(2A) for business promotion expenses and the claim for delay in the payment of provident fund penalty deduction were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:13:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 164 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance under section 40A(3) of the IT Act, 1961. However, the disallowances under section 37(2A) for business promotion expenses and the claim for delay in the payment of provident fund penalty deduction were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>