<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 104 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67131</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the disallowance of expenses related to stock, the addition of income from hiring the barge, and the dispute over hiring charges accrual. It also dismissed the claim for investment allowance on additions to the barge under section 32A, ruling in favor of the Department and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:11:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 104 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67131</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the disallowance of expenses related to stock, the addition of income from hiring the barge, and the dispute over hiring charges accrual. It also dismissed the claim for investment allowance on additions to the barge under section 32A, ruling in favor of the Department and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67131</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>