<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 125 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67123</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders for the assessment years 1981-82, 1982-83, 1983-84, 1984-85, and 1985-86, finding that the reopening of assessments and the reassessments were based on changes of opinion rather than new information. The objections raised by the Department regarding deductions, depreciation, and capital subsidy were found to be without merit. The appeals of the Department and cross-objections were dismissed, while the appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:56:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 125 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67123</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders for the assessment years 1981-82, 1982-83, 1983-84, 1984-85, and 1985-86, finding that the reopening of assessments and the reassessments were based on changes of opinion rather than new information. The objections raised by the Department regarding deductions, depreciation, and capital subsidy were found to be without merit. The appeals of the Department and cross-objections were dismissed, while the appeals of the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>