https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67105 The Tribunal held that no partition could be effected in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) with a sole surviving coparcener, which included a husband as the Karta and his wife as the only member. The family arrangement in this case did not reduce the HUF's wealth or income. The Tribunal directed the Wealth Tax Officer to determine the share that should have been allocated to the wife from the larger HUF and treat that amount as hers. As a result, the assessee's appeals were partly allowed based on this decision. en-us Tue, 27 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:16:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67105 The Tribunal held that no partition could be effected in a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) with a sole surviving coparcener, which included a husband as the Karta and his wife as the only member. The family arrangement in this case did not reduce the HUF's wealth or income. The Tribunal directed the Wealth Tax Officer to determine the share that should have been allocated to the wife from the larger HUF and treat that amount as hers. As a result, the assessee's appeals were partly allowed based on this decision. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Tue, 27 Jan 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67105