<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 119 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67102</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 17(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 could not be sustained against a legal heir for a deceased assessee&#039;s delayed gift-tax return. The default in filing had already been committed by the deceased, and there was no material showing any notice to, or independent default by, the legal representative. Section 19, dealing with tax liability through a legal representative, was held inapplicable to penalty for late filing, and section 13(1) did not create any legal fiction extending penalty liability to the heir for an already completed default. In the absence of express statutory authority, penalty proceedings could not validly continue against the legal representative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 119 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67102</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 17(1)(a) of the Gift-tax Act, 1958 could not be sustained against a legal heir for a deceased assessee&#039;s delayed gift-tax return. The default in filing had already been committed by the deceased, and there was no material showing any notice to, or independent default by, the legal representative. Section 19, dealing with tax liability through a legal representative, was held inapplicable to penalty for late filing, and section 13(1) did not create any legal fiction extending penalty liability to the heir for an already completed default. In the absence of express statutory authority, penalty proceedings could not validly continue against the legal representative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>