<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 121 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in an appeal against the addition under section 40A(3) of the IT Act. It found that the cash payments for the purchase of silver were made under exceptional circumstances, complying with Rule 6DD(j) of the IT Rules and CBDT circular instructions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of meeting rule requirements to justify cash payments. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 40,092 to the total income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 121 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in an appeal against the addition under section 40A(3) of the IT Act. It found that the cash payments for the purchase of silver were made under exceptional circumstances, complying with Rule 6DD(j) of the IT Rules and CBDT circular instructions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of meeting rule requirements to justify cash payments. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting the addition of Rs. 40,092 to the total income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>