<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67008</link>
    <description>Addition based solely on low yield in ground-nut and cotton-seed accounts cannot be sustained where the assessee maintains regular books of account with quantitative details and the department points out no specific defect in the accounts or accounting system. Yield of oil may vary with seed quality, climatic conditions, machinery, extraction method, and management efficiency, so a year-to-year comparison by itself is insufficient. The ITAT deleted the addition, holding the adjustment unjustified on the facts presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:18:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (6) TMI 72 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67008</link>
      <description>Addition based solely on low yield in ground-nut and cotton-seed accounts cannot be sustained where the assessee maintains regular books of account with quantitative details and the department points out no specific defect in the accounts or accounting system. Yield of oil may vary with seed quality, climatic conditions, machinery, extraction method, and management efficiency, so a year-to-year comparison by itself is insufficient. The ITAT deleted the addition, holding the adjustment unjustified on the facts presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>