<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (3) TMI 123 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67004</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, reducing the unexplained investment in the construction of the house property to Rs. 5,000 and the estimated income from truck plying to Rs. 6,000 for the assessment year 1975-76. The Tribunal also adjusted the income estimates from old trucks, leading to a reduction in income calculations. Furthermore, the Tribunal deleted the addition in the coal account for the assessment year 1976-77, citing discrepancies in income estimation and improved GP rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:57:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (3) TMI 123 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67004</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, reducing the unexplained investment in the construction of the house property to Rs. 5,000 and the estimated income from truck plying to Rs. 6,000 for the assessment year 1975-76. The Tribunal also adjusted the income estimates from old trucks, leading to a reduction in income calculations. Furthermore, the Tribunal deleted the addition in the coal account for the assessment year 1976-77, citing discrepancies in income estimation and improved GP rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>