<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (2) TMI 123 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66990</link>
    <description>The High Court clarified that penalty provisions under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act should be applied retrospectively based on the law at the time of filing the return. The Tribunal cancelled the penalty imposed by the assessing officer, as the explanation provided by the assessee was deemed acceptable and not disproved by the department, resulting in no penalty being levied under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for the assessment year in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:18:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (2) TMI 123 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66990</link>
      <description>The High Court clarified that penalty provisions under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act should be applied retrospectively based on the law at the time of filing the return. The Tribunal cancelled the penalty imposed by the assessing officer, as the explanation provided by the assessee was deemed acceptable and not disproved by the department, resulting in no penalty being levied under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for the assessment year in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>