<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (7) TMI 125 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66987</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the CIT(A) in both issues. It confirmed the deletion of disallowance of interest on a partner&#039;s debit balance, as the debit balance was temporary and not linked to borrowed funds. Additionally, it upheld the deletion of disallowance of interest on overdrafts obtained against fixed deposits, stating that partners had the right to invest as they pleased without contravening tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:11:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (7) TMI 125 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66987</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the decisions of the CIT(A) in both issues. It confirmed the deletion of disallowance of interest on a partner&#039;s debit balance, as the debit balance was temporary and not linked to borrowed funds. Additionally, it upheld the deletion of disallowance of interest on overdrafts obtained against fixed deposits, stating that partners had the right to invest as they pleased without contravening tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>