<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (5) TMI 67 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66976</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed by the Income-tax Appellate Commissioner (IAC) under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized that the burden of proof for concealment lies with the Department, and as they failed to provide conclusive evidence that the amount represented concealed income, the penalty was deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 15:45:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (5) TMI 67 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66976</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed by the Income-tax Appellate Commissioner (IAC) under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal emphasized that the burden of proof for concealment lies with the Department, and as they failed to provide conclusive evidence that the amount represented concealed income, the penalty was deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>