<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (6) TMI 74 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66969</link>
    <description>Light refreshments and routine working meals served to trade clients in the ordinary course of business were not treated as entertainment expenditure under section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because such outlays were regarded as allowable business expenditure. The Tribunal followed its earlier view and supporting High Court decisions, and the disallowance was deleted with the deduction allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 13:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (6) TMI 74 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66969</link>
      <description>Light refreshments and routine working meals served to trade clients in the ordinary course of business were not treated as entertainment expenditure under section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, because such outlays were regarded as allowable business expenditure. The Tribunal followed its earlier view and supporting High Court decisions, and the disallowance was deleted with the deduction allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>