<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 110 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66905</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue notice under section 158BC, the reference to the Valuation Officer was erroneous, and the determination of undisclosed income was not in accordance with Chapter XIV-B. The assessment was set aside based on these key grounds, with the Tribunal highlighting procedural lapses and lack of proper application of mind by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:57:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=105340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 110 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66905</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to issue notice under section 158BC, the reference to the Valuation Officer was erroneous, and the determination of undisclosed income was not in accordance with Chapter XIV-B. The assessment was set aside based on these key grounds, with the Tribunal highlighting procedural lapses and lack of proper application of mind by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>